News

8th Circuit Rules UMLC Clients Can Sue Over Union Leave

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 

Friday, August 12, 2022

Contact: 

Chris Mulcahey

[email protected]

8th Circuit Rules UMLC Clients Can Sue Over Union Leave

Anoka-Hennepin taxpayers allege the teachers’ union is illegally using taxpayer dollars to advance union political causes

Golden Valley, MN – Yesterday, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Upper Midwest Law Center’s clients that their lawsuit alleging misuse of taxpayer funds may proceed. The court pointed to the importance of the relationship between the taxpayers and the school district to demonstrate standing for the case.

“Unions have no shortage of money to engage in political activity, but they certainly should not be doing it with the public’s money,” said Doug Seaton, President and Founder of UMLC. “This continued inappropriate use of taxpayer money for union activism must be stopped. We’re confident that this case will set an important precedent for all public unions in Minnesota and across the country.”

On December 2, 2020, three residents of the Anoka-Hennepin School District sued Anoka-Hennepin Education Minnesota (American Federation of Teachers Local 7007) and the Anoka-Hennepin School District, seeking to stop teachers from taking 100 days per year of paid leave to door-knock and phone-bank in support of union-endorsed levies, political candidates, and other policies. This paid leave policy costs taxpayers between $67 and $346 dollars per leave day, which could amount to $34,600 per year in wages alone. The lawsuit argues that district taxpayers should not be forced to pay for the union’s members to push union politics.

The district court originally dismissed the case for lack of standing, but the 8th Circuit’s decision reverses that and sends the case back to the federal district court for a decision on its merits.

Read the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals decision here.

###

Related News

Minnesota Supreme Court ruled largely in favor of the Upper Midwest Law Center’s challenge to the Secretary of State’s absentee ballot processing rule, which the Secretary had interpreted as allowing virtually any signature to satisfy the statute’s signature match requirement for absentee ballots. The Upper Midwest Law Center represented the Minnesota Voters Alliance and three absentee ballot board members in the case.
The Upper Midwest Law Center (UMLC) recently submitted a reply brief to the federal Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals (COA) as part of UMLC’s appeal seeking a reversal of the District Court’s decision to dismiss Joseph Norgren’s and Aaron Norgren’s lawsuits based on the department’s violations of their violating their First Amendment and federal employment rights. 

Sign up for email updates

Get on the list for Upper Midwest Law Center email updates.

Social updates

Stay up to date by following us on social media.

Tell us your story

Perhaps you have another issue you wish to bring to our attention. Share your story with us.